III BEHIND THE STORY
Felix ThijsenLaw and Justice Criminal Justice Project Unit 2
01 / Profile of the accused

The people.
The context.

A CASE STUDY / GYPSY ROSE BLANCHARDRead this chapter ↓
← All chaptersCHAPTER 01 / 04

Profile of the accused

Gypsy and Nicholas

Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Nicholas Paul Godejohn were the two people accused in the killing of Gypsy’s mother, Clauddine “Dee Dee” Blanchard. When prosecutors filed the first charges on June 16, 2015, Gypsy was 23 and Godejohn was 26. They had met online in 2012 and carried on a secret long-distance relationship while Gypsy lived with Dee Dee in Springfield, Missouri, and Godejohn lived in Big Bend, Wisconsin. They met in person at a movie theater in March 2015. Dee Dee was the victim in the criminal case, not one of the accused (“Daughter and Paramour Charged”; Diaz and Smith).

A controlled childhood

Gypsy’s background matters because her life was unusually controlled. Her father, Rod Blanchard, told ABC News that Dee Dee became Gypsy’s main caregiver and closely supervised his visits. By the time Gypsy was eight, Dee Dee was telling others that her daughter had serious conditions including leukemia and muscular dystrophy. Gypsy used a wheelchair and feeding tube and went through repeated medical treatment. After Hurricane Katrina, mother and daughter moved from Louisiana to Springfield and later received a Habitat for Humanity home. ABC News reported that medical records it reviewed showed treatment by many doctors, while Gypsy later said she knew she could walk and eat but believed some of what her mother told her about being sick. A neurologist who examined her as a teenager later said he found no support for some claimed diagnoses. These details support serious concerns about medical abuse, but they do not justify diagnosing Dee Dee from a distance. Gypsy also described physical control and punishment in interviews, including being prevented from leaving. Those specific claims should be understood as her account unless independently established (Smith, Diaz, and Valiente).

Nicholas Godejohn

Reliable public information about Godejohn’s early childhood is more limited. At his 2018 trial, the defense presented evidence that he had been diagnosed with autism and had cognitive limitations. The prosecution’s expert also agreed that he was on the autism spectrum but disputed what that meant for his ability to deliberate before the killing. Those facts were relevant to the legal arguments at trial, not proof that autism caused the crime (“VERDICT”; “Gypsy Blanchard Now Likely to Testify”).

Reported motives

The possible motives are also best stated as attributed accounts. Gypsy told ABC News that she wanted to escape her mother and did not describe hatred as her reason for wanting Dee Dee dead. Godejohn said he believed he was helping or saving Gypsy and that he wanted them to be together. Prosecutors later treated Gypsy’s reported history of abuse as major mitigating context when resolving her case, while still saying the killing was not legally justified (“Gypsy Blanchard Pleads Guilty”; Diaz and Smith).

A booking photograph or a dramatized television scene cannot establish either person’s motive. The stronger evidence comes from their statements, communications, investigative records, and court proceedings.

FIG. 02Booking photograph of Gypsy Rose Blanchard facing the camera.
02 / DOCUMENTARY IMAGEGypsy Rose Blanchard in an undated booking photograph from the Waukesha County Sheriff’s Department after her 2015 arrest. A booking photograph records that a person was in custody; the photograph itself does not establish guilt.Waukesha County Sheriff’s Department photo via AP / ABC News. · Image source ↗
FIG. 03Booking photograph of Gypsy Rose Blanchard facing the camera.
03 / DOCUMENTARY IMAGENicholas Godejohn in an undated booking photograph.Waukesha County Sheriff’s Department via AP / ABC News · Image source ↗
Investigation→